ARE WE BENEFITTING FROM AN EVOLUTIONARY ACCIDENT

As you are reading these words, you are taking part in one of the most unacknowledged; taken for granted wonders of the natural world. You and I belong to a species with a remarkable ability: we can shape events in each other’s brains with remarkable precision. No occult designs  here….just access to language.  Simply by making noises with our mouths, we can reliably cause precise new combinations of ideas to arise in each other’s minds. 

Its one of the reasons Mickey Mouse and Garfield are such cinematic successes; they speak. Garfield,that lovely lasagna loving feline specimen, pot-bellied furry glutton of a cat can convey that he wants lasagna only by the use of words in our cinema. Yummy!

But real cats cant talk; Somewhere; along the course of evolution, our four-legged peers got left behind and therein lies the travesty. 

The human language is doubtless one of the most distinctive behavioral adaptations on the planet. A book, The Seeds of Speech, by Jean Aitchison speaks thus about the evolution of speech-

‘a deprived physical environment led to more meat-eating and, as a result, a bigger brain.  The enlarged brain led to the premature birth of humans, and in consequence a protracted childhood, during which mothers cooed and crooned to their offspring.  An upright stance altered the shape of the mouth and vocal tract, allowing a range of coherent sounds to be uttered.’

Some scholars assume the development of primitive language-like systems (proto-language) as early as Homo habilis, while others place the development of primitive symbolic communication only with Homo erectus (1.8 million years ago) or Homo heidelbergensis (0.6 million years ago) and the development of language proper with Homo sapiens less than 100,000 years ago.

Aitchisons views find a resonance in Milton, who said "Without meat, it's unlikely that proto humans could have secured enough energy and nutrition from the plants available in their African environment at that time to evolve into the active, sociable, intelligent creatures they became. Receding forests would have deprived them of the more nutritious leaves and fruits that forest-dwelling primates survive on, said Milton."

On the flip side, if eating animals was a neccessary catalyst into homo sapien evolution (high-protein based diets were necessary for us to develop large brains, and therefore great intellect), can you imagine what present day lions will evolve into? Scary thought.

Step-wise details on how we all started to wax eloquent; or rather move from “burr berr blah” to  exquisite poetry is not available (palaeontologists; pls note). Maybe; a better explanationis that the evolution of the human brain and speech is a one in a zillion evolutionary accident that has rendered us Oscar Wilde, Chaucer, Shakespeare, George Washingtons oratory and Martin Luther Kings passion.

The mystery is such that in 1866 the Linguistic Society of Paris famously banned all discussion of the origin of language, deeming it to be an unanswerable problem. Was Phrygian the worlds first language; was it Hebrew? Will we ever know?

Languages evolved in only one species, in only one way, without precedent, except in the most general sense. Of about 7000 languages that exist in the world, it can be intelligently surmised that certain pervasive discoveries such as electricity, computers, refrigerator, internet and phones spread without linguistic assistance. So language assists but is not the only driver of successful communication!

This evolutionary accident has defined us and is evolving even more with each day. Theres more evolution coming our way!

With a blog titled unopionionated, Ive been happily reading Obamas opinions on Romney, Romneys opinions on Obama.

In my humble opinion, Mr. Scott Rasmussen, whose reports provide the daily presidential polls is a busy man. (no brainer)

But a true leader is one who leads by example and not by opinion, and Paulo Coelho would agree.

But theres a problem, example versus opinion is actually 'opinion of example' versus 'opinion of opinion' . This again, is as shrouded in opinion as our general opinion of who was more beautiful, Madhubala or Maharani Gayatri Devi?

Which brings us to the real problem with opinions...they are subjective. To prove them either way, one needs something called argument. Now arguments have no end. Hence opinions and their corollarys which will be stated grandiosely, in an impassioned manner, in the course of an argument, to support an opinion will border on being 'unfounded, lame and often moronic.

Is there a possibility that my opinion may convince your opinion? That purely depends on whether you have to suck up to me for your livelihood. Or maybe you want to appeal to any of my senses for favourable gestures to be bestowed upon you.

For the time being...I am content to remain 'unopinionated'

I am blogging in the full hope that my blogs are appreciated. Selfish!

In that sense, the title unopinionated is intensely oxymoronic. Everyone has an opinion; like everyone has a nose.

The history of human opinion is the history of all redoubtable human endeavour. Almost all opinions come with an expiry date; except those of legends and revolutionaries we seek inspiration from. In such cases, a lifetime of work symbolises an opinion lived through and through.

Opinions are drawn from a curious cloud-based picture-board called perspective. Two children born from the same mother could have varied opinions on everything.

Opinions set a beautiful chain reaction. I tell you mine, and then I have to hear yours. Then the process continues till one of us reaches some point called conviction or boredom or anger. 

Opinions can possess people passionately, create revolutions, newspapers, blogs and whatnot! Its healthy to have one. Its healthier to not let your opinion influence your perception of another. What would be divine is to have opinions with the conviction and power to not just hog headlines but bring reform.